What Went Right? Well, they looked good, I’ll give them that. Honduras used an up-tempo, largely frenetic counterattack, making pretty good use of both flanks. Pretty athletic and well disciplined side through the center in their own half, and a fairly well-conditioned side that their opponents certainly weren’t going to exhaust. Good on 50-50 balls, and decent goalkeeping.
What Went Wrong? For the most part the Honduran attack was nonexistent. They probably spent more time in their own end than any team in the tournament. Just had no ability to sustain any kind of offensive buildup whatsoever, and when they got the ball for the most part they ignored the center of the field altogether. Sort passes, long passes, through balls – none of them were any good, and they were dispossessed very easily all over the pitch, which means they gave up an awful lot of possession. They didn’t score once, but I can’t really lay a lion’s share of the blame on their front men for that because their midfield hardly serviced them at all. If the front players wanted the ball they had to go back and get it, so they took pretty much all of their shots from very long distance, with predictable results. Especially on the flanks their defense was more reactive rather than proactive, not really closing down anybody, not showing any ability in the tackle, not showing very good anticipation skills and not cutting off the passing lanes. Needless to say this resulted in teams having an easy time finding space and getting behind them.
Who Stepped Up To The Plate? Goalkeeper Noel Valladares, center backs Maynor Figueroa and Wilson Palacios, and defensive midfielder Armando Guevara were under siege but did everything they could to keep Honduras in games.
Who Didn’t Show Up? Fullbacks Emilio Izaguirre and Sergio Mendoza were one of the two or three worst fullback tandems in South Africa. There was just no kind of attacking creativity, vision, orchestration or imagination from midfielders Armando Guevara, Daniel Turcios or Roger Espinoza, and their individual ball skills were atrocious. Front men Walter Martinez and David Suazo (and Carlos Pavon off the bench) did absolutely nothing despite the fact that it wasn’t their fault they weren’t getting any service. Nobody from the bench was of any help.
How Was The Coaching? I don’t think Honduras was going to make it through to the next round even if their approach was a lot more sustained and creative, but I do know that they would have scored a few goals and attacked with a lot more imagination, creativity and directness if Reinaldo Rueda hadn’t insisted on employing a stiflingly restrictive 4-4-2 formation. How was the coaching? What do you think?
Did They Finish Where They Were Expected? Yes, but they could have done a little better and made some waves with the center of the defense playing as well as it did.
Now What? Honduras is a small country with not much of a football pedigree. They need to get rid of Rueda, come into the 21st century and employ a five-man midfield with one target man up front. That will at least slow down the defensive breakdowns on the flanks. Hey, in a time when even the smallest countries employing tactically disciplined defenses can get to the knockout stages of the World Cup, even a country as small as Honduras can do it, too.