<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MCZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcz.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcz.com/blog</link>
	<description>The blogsite for MCZ - a portal for multiple independent e-zines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fans of ABH Rejoice by CraigAD</title>
		<link>http://mcz.com/blog/?p=760&#038;cpage=1#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcz.com/blog/?p=760#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Lebron&#039;s best comment yet came after the game when a reporter asked him if it bothered him that so many wanted to see him fail:  “All the people that were rooting on me to fail, at the end of the day they have to wake up tomorrow and have the same life that they had before they woke up today. They have the same personal problems they had today,” ... he has moved so quickly from hero to villain you have to wonder if his journey of redemption in the public eye will be as quick.  Eventually he will be seen as a sympathetic character but the first step will be not saying crap like that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lebron&#8217;s best comment yet came after the game when a reporter asked him if it bothered him that so many wanted to see him fail:  “All the people that were rooting on me to fail, at the end of the day they have to wake up tomorrow and have the same life that they had before they woke up today. They have the same personal problems they had today,” &#8230; he has moved so quickly from hero to villain you have to wonder if his journey of redemption in the public eye will be as quick.  Eventually he will be seen as a sympathetic character but the first step will be not saying crap like that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Ready For Some Football??? by daveydoug</title>
		<link>http://mcz.com/blog/?p=296&#038;cpage=1#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>daveydoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcz.com/blog/?p=296#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Actually, Jimmy Clausen wouldn&#039;t be that bad of a pick for the Raiders -- which is why Al Davis won&#039;t do it. In his 40 years in professional football have you ever known Crazy Al to admit he made a mistake? The Raiders certainly need a franchise QB, and unlike that fat-ass JaMarcus Russell, who has absolutely no work ethic to go with his 290+ pounds, Clausen is the most NFL ready QB in this year&#039;s draft (if not the QB with the most future upside; that distinction belongs to Sam Bradford). Plus, Clausen has a work ethic and the brains to run a pro-style offense going in. Plus Davis has never been shy about spending money, even when he has a &quot;franchise quarterback&quot; already on the roster he&#039;s on the hook for close to $60M large. But if Crazy Al were to take Clausen with the 8th overall pick, by implication he would be admitting that drafting Russell was a mistake and a colossal failure after only three years -- and unlike past mistakes there would be nobody else to blame that mistake on. Crazy Al absolutely NEVER admits he is responsible for anything; never mind that the ONLY person who has ever drafted anybody in the Raider organization has been Al Davis alone. Nope, Davis would rather spend the obscene amount of money it takes to pay a failure than admit he was wrong about ANYTHING!

So Jimmy Clausen wouldn&#039;t be the out-of-whack choice you&#039;d think he would be for the Raiders. And while taking Bruce Campbell would certainly be a reach -- workout warrior who has done practically nothing in college is actually a norm for the NFL -- it still would not rise to the level of the insanity Crazy Al performed in last year&#039;s draft. Nope, you want to see a repeat of last year&#039;s insanity, then wait to see if Crazy Al turns in the card to Roger Goodell for Jacoby Ford with the 8th overall pick. Then the proof will be in the pudding: Crazy Al is certifiable.

davvydoug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Jimmy Clausen wouldn&#8217;t be that bad of a pick for the Raiders &#8212; which is why Al Davis won&#8217;t do it. In his 40 years in professional football have you ever known Crazy Al to admit he made a mistake? The Raiders certainly need a franchise QB, and unlike that fat-ass JaMarcus Russell, who has absolutely no work ethic to go with his 290+ pounds, Clausen is the most NFL ready QB in this year&#8217;s draft (if not the QB with the most future upside; that distinction belongs to Sam Bradford). Plus, Clausen has a work ethic and the brains to run a pro-style offense going in. Plus Davis has never been shy about spending money, even when he has a &#8220;franchise quarterback&#8221; already on the roster he&#8217;s on the hook for close to $60M large. But if Crazy Al were to take Clausen with the 8th overall pick, by implication he would be admitting that drafting Russell was a mistake and a colossal failure after only three years &#8212; and unlike past mistakes there would be nobody else to blame that mistake on. Crazy Al absolutely NEVER admits he is responsible for anything; never mind that the ONLY person who has ever drafted anybody in the Raider organization has been Al Davis alone. Nope, Davis would rather spend the obscene amount of money it takes to pay a failure than admit he was wrong about ANYTHING!</p>
<p>So Jimmy Clausen wouldn&#8217;t be the out-of-whack choice you&#8217;d think he would be for the Raiders. And while taking Bruce Campbell would certainly be a reach &#8212; workout warrior who has done practically nothing in college is actually a norm for the NFL &#8212; it still would not rise to the level of the insanity Crazy Al performed in last year&#8217;s draft. Nope, you want to see a repeat of last year&#8217;s insanity, then wait to see if Crazy Al turns in the card to Roger Goodell for Jacoby Ford with the 8th overall pick. Then the proof will be in the pudding: Crazy Al is certifiable.</p>
<p>davvydoug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Once Again, Oakland Doesn&#8217;t Disappoint by daveydoug</title>
		<link>http://mcz.com/blog/?p=149&#038;cpage=1#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>daveydoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcz.com/blog/?p=149#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Thank You, Big Al. Ever since you picked punter Ray Guy in 1973 with the Raiders first-round pick, the greatest punter ever and the first punter ever chosen in the first round, you think you know more about football than anybody else. As a result, ever since then you have drafted these &quot;reaches&quot; early on draft day (Todd Marijuanovich, Sebastian Janikowski, Fabian Washington, Phillip Buchanon). Because of this and your unfounded obsession with speed, this year may be your biggest blunder of all. WRs Michael Crabtree and Jeremy Maclin fall into your lap at overall pick #7 -- and you pick the guy who would have been there in the last third of the first round.

I&#039;ve finally figured out what your problem is, Al: Along with being old and senilte (1) you haven&#039;t a clue about the concept of value; and (2) for whatever reason you have placed way too much emphasis on straight-line speed as an NFL gauge, instead of putting it into context with all the other measurable skills.

Even if you think Darius Hayward-Bay is the best wideout in the draft, and he turns into the greatest reciever ever, he was going to be around late. He wasn&#039;t worth where you picked him. You could have traded down out of that #7 spot, pick up one or two more sorely needed picks in a year when you only had five total picks to start with, and still grabbed Hayward-Bay in the mid-20&#039;s.

Now, along with overpaying a marginal DT with the largest contract for an interior lineman ever and rewarding a close-down corner with elite money for only eight games before cutting him, your stuck with having to pay $35M-$45M for what amounts to a sprinter with no ball skills.

Why did you do this? Because with all the other measurables Hayward-Bay couldn&#039;t do at the combine and at his pro day, the one thing he did do was run a 4.30 40, the fastest time of any player available this year. You&#039;d have been better off waiting until the draft was over and signing Usain Bolt to a free agent contract.

But then your senility didn&#039;t end there, did it, Al? You sent Raider fans running through brick walls with what you did in the second round. Mike Mitchell was so far down the pre-draft food chain that he was rated the 68th best safety prospect. 68TH?!?! NOBODY WAS GOING TO DRAFT THIS GUY!!! Yet because you heard he ran a 4.3 40 at his pro day (a workout no NFL team even attended), you spent a second-round pick on somebody who wasn&#039;t even going to get drafted and you could have signed to an un-guarenteed league minimum. Now you&#039;re stuck with having to give a multi-year deal to somebody, unlike Hayward-Bay, whose talent isn&#039;t even marginal.

I guess it&#039;s true what they say: You can&#039;t teach an old dog new tricks. If you could, then you would have noticed, Al, that of the last six players you drafted that were the fastest of their draft class, five of them were colossal failures (the jury is still out on Darren McFadden).

But hey, I&#039;m a 49ers fan. What I love about the 49ers drafting behind you, Al, is that we can always count on your senility to benefit everybody behind you. Because of what you did the draft stategies of everybody picking after #7 changed drastically, and arguably the most talented player in this year&#039;s draft -- and certainly the only wideout with elite skills -- was there when the 49ers picked at #10. Only in my wet dreams could I ever have imagined that the 49ers would get Michael Crabtree.

Thank You, Al, Thank You So, So Much! Have fun spending the next 10-15 years looking across the bay and being constantly reminded of what you could have had.

daveydoug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You, Big Al. Ever since you picked punter Ray Guy in 1973 with the Raiders first-round pick, the greatest punter ever and the first punter ever chosen in the first round, you think you know more about football than anybody else. As a result, ever since then you have drafted these &#8220;reaches&#8221; early on draft day (Todd Marijuanovich, Sebastian Janikowski, Fabian Washington, Phillip Buchanon). Because of this and your unfounded obsession with speed, this year may be your biggest blunder of all. WRs Michael Crabtree and Jeremy Maclin fall into your lap at overall pick #7 &#8212; and you pick the guy who would have been there in the last third of the first round.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve finally figured out what your problem is, Al: Along with being old and senilte (1) you haven&#8217;t a clue about the concept of value; and (2) for whatever reason you have placed way too much emphasis on straight-line speed as an NFL gauge, instead of putting it into context with all the other measurable skills.</p>
<p>Even if you think Darius Hayward-Bay is the best wideout in the draft, and he turns into the greatest reciever ever, he was going to be around late. He wasn&#8217;t worth where you picked him. You could have traded down out of that #7 spot, pick up one or two more sorely needed picks in a year when you only had five total picks to start with, and still grabbed Hayward-Bay in the mid-20&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Now, along with overpaying a marginal DT with the largest contract for an interior lineman ever and rewarding a close-down corner with elite money for only eight games before cutting him, your stuck with having to pay $35M-$45M for what amounts to a sprinter with no ball skills.</p>
<p>Why did you do this? Because with all the other measurables Hayward-Bay couldn&#8217;t do at the combine and at his pro day, the one thing he did do was run a 4.30 40, the fastest time of any player available this year. You&#8217;d have been better off waiting until the draft was over and signing Usain Bolt to a free agent contract.</p>
<p>But then your senility didn&#8217;t end there, did it, Al? You sent Raider fans running through brick walls with what you did in the second round. Mike Mitchell was so far down the pre-draft food chain that he was rated the 68th best safety prospect. 68TH?!?! NOBODY WAS GOING TO DRAFT THIS GUY!!! Yet because you heard he ran a 4.3 40 at his pro day (a workout no NFL team even attended), you spent a second-round pick on somebody who wasn&#8217;t even going to get drafted and you could have signed to an un-guarenteed league minimum. Now you&#8217;re stuck with having to give a multi-year deal to somebody, unlike Hayward-Bay, whose talent isn&#8217;t even marginal.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s true what they say: You can&#8217;t teach an old dog new tricks. If you could, then you would have noticed, Al, that of the last six players you drafted that were the fastest of their draft class, five of them were colossal failures (the jury is still out on Darren McFadden).</p>
<p>But hey, I&#8217;m a 49ers fan. What I love about the 49ers drafting behind you, Al, is that we can always count on your senility to benefit everybody behind you. Because of what you did the draft stategies of everybody picking after #7 changed drastically, and arguably the most talented player in this year&#8217;s draft &#8212; and certainly the only wideout with elite skills &#8212; was there when the 49ers picked at #10. Only in my wet dreams could I ever have imagined that the 49ers would get Michael Crabtree.</p>
<p>Thank You, Al, Thank You So, So Much! Have fun spending the next 10-15 years looking across the bay and being constantly reminded of what you could have had.</p>
<p>daveydoug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post-Superbowl Depression Aids by daveydoug</title>
		<link>http://mcz.com/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>daveydoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcz.com/blog/?p=131#comment-291</guid>
		<description>We can find the draft order anywhere, Dude. It would be much more interesting if you gave us some idea who you think will go where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can find the draft order anywhere, Dude. It would be much more interesting if you gave us some idea who you think will go where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post-Superbowl Depression Aids by BlogEditor</title>
		<link>http://mcz.com/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogEditor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcz.com/blog/?p=131#comment-290</guid>
		<description>OK, maybe it should be &quot;With the first pick of the 2009 NFL Draft, the Detroit Lions select Rae Carruth - wide receiver, University of Colorado…”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, maybe it should be &#8220;With the first pick of the 2009 NFL Draft, the Detroit Lions select Rae Carruth &#8211; wide receiver, University of Colorado…”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post-Superbowl Depression Aids by CraigAD</title>
		<link>http://mcz.com/blog/?p=131&#038;cpage=1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcz.com/blog/?p=131#comment-289</guid>
		<description>You have it all wrong ... if it&#039;s the Lions they are required by NFL bylaws to select a wide receiver with the first pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have it all wrong &#8230; if it&#8217;s the Lions they are required by NFL bylaws to select a wide receiver with the first pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

